Yes absolutely symmetry is important. My main gripe with the current official UI is that some elements look phenomenal but some looks out of place. I mean the current UI feels inconsistent IMO.
But yeah my designs just reflects my taste and it might give the team an idea on some UI elements.
Thanks again.
I am much of a symmetry guy with rounded squareish edges and all but something is really special about this model… I like it 
.
It has everything a noob person like me in banking needs in a banking app.
We admire your work
but my review is that you should not fit all the info and option in just one square . Expense and income, bill payments, many pots, cards big square icon in very limited space.
Not symmetry at the bottom. Scan and pay not aligned very well.
All icons are very large.
No tabs, everything become messy in single window
The moveable HUD icon is pretty good idea. But can we make it optional?
Say it defaults to opt in, but the user can turn it off if needed in the settings?
Turn on/off HUD in the settings would be nice 
Sorry for posting too many…im just addicted to this 
here are my other mockups with dark mode…
Light Mode:
Grey Mode:
Dark Mode:
This UI is awesome.
It is similar to that of CRED’s UI some 3-4 months ago.However their UI is very horrible now.
Your UI in Light mode really looks nice however everyone now want dark mode.
Maybe you can improvise the dark mode as letters are not lucid enough.
I think in dark mode bold texts do better. And thanks for your comment.
We’re actually revamping the home page. We’ll talk about it and let you guys test it a bit next week. An announcement will be made for Jupiter labs.
I think date & time are not that important. Instead of date/time we should have description. The transactions should be listed date wise with date in separate line as shown here and time can be seen in the detailed view of txn:
Jupiter logo looks cool that’s why and text size depends on the DPI of the user’s screen so yeah it can be easily optimized accordingly.
I felt the same regarding “scan and pay” button.
And when will I be invited to jupiter labs?
I disagree. Date and time in transactions are important. Should we fish out a transaction, how to do that if you have no idea when that transaction happened?
I hate Standard Chartered’s mobile app because of this. On their quest to simplify, the forgot the basic of things- transaction history.
Yes… description can be viewed/edited only when the user touches a particular transaction.
I hear you, but we do need date n time mentioned on transaction history. 99% of transaction description I’ve come across are gibberish. The few I can add, I don’t bother to, because tags exist, and Jupiter does a fine job categorising them (most of the time).
Maybe it’s my personal bias, but I don’t get the fetish with Descriptions 
If you do use them, can you share your opinion?
I don’t care about description but I do care about the way each transactions are displayed. I suggest jupiter team to make a system that automatically converts the “gibberish” description to useful readable ones like the transaction names shown in the above mock-ups.
